Lowest Price vs. Lowest Cost

Why “L1” Procurement Often Leads to Dust Collection Failure

In many organizations, dust collection systems are purchased under "L1" rules; the lowest price wins. While this approach simplifies the purchasing process, it often ignores the operational realities that dictate whether a system succeeds or fails.

The result? Systems that meet the budget on day one, but struggle in the field by day 100.

 

The Problem with "L1" Thinking

Lowest-price procurement focuses on Capital Expenditure (CAPEX): the price of components and the immediate savings. However, it often excludes the Operating Expenses (OPEX) that define the system’s true cost:

  • Energy Consumption: A poorly designed system requires more fan power to overcome leaks or poor airflow.
  • Maintenance Labor: Hard-to-access or poorly sealed components turn routine checks into all-day projects.
  • System Lifespan: Thin materials and low-grade seals lead to premature replacement.
  • Downtime: If the dust collector goes down, the production line usually follows.

 

Where Cost-Driven Decisions Hurt Most

  1. Ducting Quality: Thin-gauge materials or poor sealing methods lead to leaks and system imbalances. This often requires expensive rework within the first few years.
  2. Maintenance Access: Systems designed to be "cheap" are almost always expensive to maintain because they lack the flexibility for quick inspections or clean-outs.
  3. Engineering Support: A low-price bid rarely includes the deep application expertise required to ensure the system is actually sized for your specific dust type.

 

The Hidden Cost Curve

Low-price systems typically follow a predictable, expensive pattern:

  1. Phase 1: Initial operation appears acceptable.
  2. Phase 2: Small leaks or dust build-up begin to affect airflow.
  3. Phase 3: Filters load prematurely; maintenance frequency spikes.
  4. Phase 4: Production interruptions occur as the system fails to keep up with the plant load.

None of these costs appear on the original purchase order.

 

Shifting the Conversation (Without Breaking the Rules)

Even within strict procurement frameworks, you can protect your operation by asking better questions during the bid phase:

  • What is the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) over 5 years?
  • How does the system handle process variability?
  • What is the ease of modification? (e.g., If we move a machine, do we have to scrap the whole duct run?)
  • What safety and NFPA standards are explicitly addressed?

 

Final Thought

Lowest-price systems don’t fail immediately, they fail predictably. The most reliable dust collection systems are those evaluated on total value, not just invoice value.

Contactez-nous

Contacter Nordfab Americas

It looks like you're coming from United States.

Would you like to go to the United States site?